With all the evidence to the contrary, I’m amazed that some people still think we are voting between two candidates on Tuesday. Make no mistake about it, we are choosing between two ideologies. In truth, it will be a referendum on America’s desire for freedom. Tuesday will be a commentary about whether the millions of Americans, who spilled their blood on battlefields and gave their lives for our liberty, wasted this precious gift on an ungrateful nation or if we will protect and defend the fruits of their sacrifice.
Just as I began working on what I hoped would be a particularly insightful article, I read a piece in Newsmax by Michael Reagan that expressed my thoughts precisely and with clear context. I thought you should read it:
Obama’s ‘Change’ Is Socialism
By: Michael Reagan
The other day, I went to a Hollywood luncheon crammed with producers, directors, writers, and other film industry notables.
One of them, Larry Gelbart of “MASH” fame, spoke telling the group that since capitalism has failed, why don’t we try socialism?
Try socialism? Take a sip of it and see how it tastes? It doesn’t work that way.
There’s an old saying that you can’t be half-socialist any more than you can be half-pregnant; get knocked up with a socialist fetus and you’ll have to deliver a full-born Marxist. There’s nothing in between. Try it, you’ll like it; and if you don’t, as the lads in the Gestapo used to tell people, they had ways to make them like it.
Larry Gelbart gorged himself at the capitalist table and came away with untold millions, now safely banked, and continues to collect even more millions from never-ending reruns of the “MASH” sitcom. Having made his bundle from our capitalist free-enterprise system, he seems to be telling us now that the rest of us should get in the socialist bread line and eat crumbs while he feasts on caviar.
One of the realities of this age is that the great mass of the American people haven’t traveled abroad to see how the rest of the world lives, a lot of it under dreary socialist regimes with stalled economies and no real chance for advancement for the ordinary citizen.
Moreover, our shoddy educational curriculum that has left most younger Americans so deficient in the study of history that vast numbers of them think George Washington was a Civil War general, or a lumberman who chopped down cherry trees. They have no real understanding of the economic system that allowed us to become the wealthiest and most powerful nation since the Roman Empire ruled most of the known world 2,000 years ago.
Given that mournful reality, the moment the economic Rolls Royce engine that drove this nation to the top of the hill stalls, instead of installing new spark plugs to get it going again, they go looking for an alternative mode of transportation.
In the present case, Obama and the Democrats are directing them to Larry Gelbart’s used-economic system lot where he shows them a jalopy with a fancy paint job on the outside and a one-cylinder motor inside that goes chug-chug.
Listening to the advice of a man who made his name and his money on a show about America’s military at war — yet told the same audience that our armed forces are nothing but “mercenaries” — doesn’t seem the smartest thing to do.
We are now a few days away from an election in which one of the presidential candidates is trying to sell that jalopy on Larry Gelbart’s lot and convince us that it is really a luxury limo that will get hundreds of miles to the gallon and carry us off to the promised land, where the rich will be impoverished and the middle class enriched and everybody will be deliriously happy.
Call Barack Obama’s program socialism, however, and he’ll swear on a stack of Qurans it isn’t. He calls it change. He says it’s fairness, not Marxism.
Oh?
How does he explain the proven fact that he has been wallowing in a sty surrounded by fervent socialists and sharing in their swill for most of his life?
According to Fox’s Bill Sammon, his messiahship recalled that when he attended Occidental College in Los Angeles “to avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully,” he wrote in “Dreams From My Father,” his memoir. “The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists.” And that was his milieu for all his years in Chicago.
To anyone familiar with socialism, Obama’s programs fit comfortably within the pages of Karl Marx’s playbook, the root of which is the redistribution of the wealth, the key to the entire Obamian vault.
What’s mine is yours, and he’s the middle man.
It’s socialism lite, and it can only evolve into socialism heavy. Remember, you can’t be half-socialist, and Barack Obama knows it.
The only questions I have are: What the heck is a “Structural Feminist”? Is this some kind of woman built out of an erector set or one who just looks that way? The other, more serious question, has to do with Obama’s “careful choice of friends”. As he tries desperately to distance himself from Wright, Ayers, Khalidi, Resco, Farrakhan, the Acorn group and the all the rest, is there any reason to believe he has recently stopped being as careful as he used to be with his choices?
On Election Day, will you cast your vote for America or for Obama’s Socialist tyranny?
R.S.F.
who he really is!” The other replied, “Ya. I guess we’ll have to wait ’til after January 20th to find out; we just don’t know that much about him.” Yes you do. You simply chose to look the other way like all the other sheep. What a terrific way to elect the most powerful man in the world! Sour grapes? You bet! I love this country; she has treated me well.
Reader Comments